Interactive Tours for High School Students

As an instructional designer, I would jump at the chance to tackle a project like the one below scenario:

Example 2: Interactive Tours

A high school history teacher, located on the west coast of the United States, wants to showcase to her students new exhibits being held at two prominent New York City museums. The teacher wants her students to take a "tour" of the museums and be able to interact with the museum curators, as well as see the art work on display. Afterward, the teacher would like to choose two pieces of artwork from each exhibit and have the students participate in a group critique of the individual work of art. As a novice of distance learning and distance learning technologies, the teacher turned to the school district’s instructional designer for assistance. In the role of the instructional designer, what distance learning technologies would you suggest the teacher use to provide the best learning experience for her students?

To begin, this scenario appealed to me as an educator and a current students working on my master’s in instructional design.  This scenario calls for the instructional designer to retrieve a website for distributed learning, as mentioned by Simonson et al., (2012).  “Distributed learning is a broader term that can be, and in fact most often is, associated with face-to-face instruction that incorporates some form of technology-based learning experience, either inside or outside the classroom” (Simonson et al., 2012, p. 124).  I enjoy the challenge of looking for new, exciting ways to present materials to my own elementary students and feel this scenario presents just that…a challenge.  The main challenge with this scenario is finding an interactive tour for the students to view the New York City museums.  The below website through Museum Hack offers tours for students to discuss the tour while they are online touring the museum.  The teacher would need to purchase tickets, just like a travelling field trip, at a cost of $59.00-$79.00, depending on the museum the teacher chooses.  First, the students could view the following website, depending on the specific, museum as a whole class, using a computer and projector.

www.museumhack.com

Along with the above website, there are also several websites that are geared toward specific museums.  As the instructional designer for the teacher, I would be sure to get a list of the specific museums from the teacher which he/she wants to tour online and locate websites that had virtual tours for the class to view.  The virtual touring technology piece gives a teacher on the opposite coast of the museums the ability to share visuals in a way as close to real life as possible.  The interactive piece allows students to ask questions while touring.

From there, students could be assigned two pieces of artwork to use in a collaborate discussion using Blackboard CourseSites.  There are many reasons I feel this piece of technology is perfect for this scenario.  First of all, CourseSites is free for the teacher, up to five courses at a time.  It is also very user friendly, in my opinion.  For high school age students, the website will be easy to navigate with facilitation from the teacher.  The incorporation of online discussion hits on many areas of standards for student learning.  Students are putting their typing and communication skills to work, along with the debating and comparison piece.  Another great feature of CourseSites for young students is that parents must agree to their students using the online resource.  One the online classroom is set up the teacher can monitor the students in a computer lab or allow them to work from home with parent supervision, depending on the assignment the teacher chooses.  The teacher can break the classroom into groups, or allow the students to choose their own group based on which pieces of artwork they wish to critique.

The class is now designed for the high school teacher to view interactive tours of museums in New York City, then set up an online discussion for the students to communicate about the two pieces of artwork.  With some facilitation from the teacher, the students will be able to learn from one another and collaborate with the use of a computer.  Collaborating online can help students to “overcome issues associated with face-to-face interactions” (Simonson et al., 2012, p. 138).

 

Resources

CourseSites by Blackboard.  Retrieved from https://www.coursesites.com/webapps/Bb-sites-course-creation-BBLEARN/pages/index.html

CourseSites by Blackboard.  2013.  CourseSites Terms of Use. Retrieved from https://www.coursesites.com/webapps/Bb-sites-course-creation-BBLEARN/pages/CourseSitesTOU_Final.pdf

Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2012).  Teaching and learning at a distance:  Foundations of distance education (5th ed.)  Boston, MA:  Pearson.

Zerve, Inc.  2015.  Museum Hack.  Retrieved from www.museumhack.com 

Defining Distance Learning

My own definition of distance learning is as follows:  A learning community that takes place, with some distance between the learners, through technological tools and facilitated by an instructor from an institution.  See the mind map below, to serve as a visual for my definition of distance learning.

For example, Walden University is considered distance learning because online courses are offered through the university (institution) and the learners use computers (technology) to complete the course.  Learners who are researching topics for their own personal knowledge growth are not considered to be distance learners.  The institution is lacking in this particular scenario.  I feel confident in the definition provided by Simonson, Smaldino, Albright, and Zvacek.  “Distance education is defined as institution-based, formal education where the learning group is separated, and where interactive telecommunications systems are used to connect learners, resources, and instructors” (Simonson et al., 2012, p. 22).  

The definition of distance learning often changes.  The definition evolves with the times.  I feel the reason for these changes in the definition is the change in technology and evolution of new technology as well as continued learning of the education process.  During my undergraduate coursework ten years ago I took a distance learning course that was very different from today’s distance learning courses.  At the time the course was considered distance learning, although it included sitting in a facility with a professional watching all the testing and quizzes.  The instructors were, however, not present throughout the course.  A librarian, teacher of any age level, etc. had to sign a release form stating they watched me take tests and quizzes.  The resource material for the course was all in the textbook, although the syllabus, tests, and quizzes were online.  Anyone taking the course was able to work at his or her own pace, but the final exam, which had to be taken at the college, was scheduled for a specific date ahead of time. 

The development of new technology has made it easier for professors to test students from a distance.  Moreover, education and what we know about how people learn has changed over the years.  For example, asking critical thinking questions and asking students to elaborate on materials they have learning has been argued as a better method of checking for understanding, rather than the traditional testing and final exam methods of the past.  Again, like the course I mentioned previously from my undergraduate college, testing was a priority for the course.  The Walden courses I take have not had any formal testing or final exams.  The courses are based on collaboration, papers to elaborate on topics, and projects to apply what was learned.

Changes in the way we live have also been a factor that has helped aid in the evolution of distance learning.  According to “Distance Learning Timeline Continuum,” distance learning originated in the United States in 1873, as an optional to traditional classrooms studies, through the postal service.  Had the definition of distance learning stayed the same as it was back then, the definition would not be accurate with today’s society and online learning communities.

Before referencing several materials this week, I felt the definition for distance learning was simple.  I thought it simply meant learning online.  I was not considering the word “distance” for what it actually means.  It was another name for online learning as I saw it.  This means that prior to this week I did not think distance learning meant there was an institution involved in the learning process, so learning online for personal gain would have fallen into the category of distance learning for me.  I had not thought before this week of the many changes that distance learning has gone through either.  Before reading “Distance Learning Timeline Continuum” I did not know learning took place through the postal service, as it did in the past.

The future of distance learning is open to many advances, in my opinion.  As technology is a major factor in the advancement of distance learning thus far, I feel technological advancements will be the underlying factor that continues to improve distance learning.  I look forward to a future where the blackboard community is even more advanced, with upgrades to the way people communicate.  I can see a discuss board where people record their thoughts through video technology and drop that presentational discussion into the blackboard.  There will be advances to technology that haven’t been created at this time, I believe.  The future holds a lot for technology in general, I am certain it holds the same for distance learning.

Resources

“Distance Learning Timeline Continuum”.  This multimedia, interactive timeline chronicles the evolution of distance learning from 1833–2009.

Huett, J., Moller, L., Foshay, W., & Coleman, C. (2008). The evolution of distance education: Implications for instructional design on the potential of the web (Part 3: K12). TechTrends, 52(5), 63–6 7.

Laureate Education (Producer). (n.d.). Distance education: The next generation [Video file]. Retrieved from https://class.waldenu.edu.

Moller, L., Foshay, W., & Huett, J. (2008). The evolution of distance education: Implications for instructional design on the potential of the web (Part 1: Training and development). TechTrends, 52(3), 70–75.

Moller, L., Foshay, W., & Huett, J. (2008). The evolution of distance education: Implications for instructional design on the potential of the web (Part 2: Higher education). TechTrends, 52(4), 66-70

Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2012). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education (5th ed.) Boston, MA: Pearson.

EDUC 6135-1

Hi Walden Classmates!


Thanks for checking out my blog.  I would love for you to subscribe!